The way in which something is spoken, written, or performed.
For more information about English prose style (including some of the traditional ways of identifying and classifying styles), see Definitions and Observations, below.
- What Is Style?
- What Are the Five Canons of Rhetoric?
- Asiatic and Attic
- Formal Style and Informal Style
- Hypotaxis and Parataxis
- Loose Sentence and Periodic Sentence
- Plain Style, Middle Style, and Grand Style
- Sentence Length and Sentence Variety
- Style Guide
- Word Choice
- The Writer's Voice: Ten Writers on Writing
- Writers on Writing: The Meaning of Style
Classic Essays on English Prose Style:
- Essays on Style
- The Colours of Style, by James Burnett
- The False Refinements in Our Style, by Jonathan Swift
- F.L. Lucas on Style
- Of Eloquence, by Oliver Goldsmith
- "Murder Your Darlings": Quiller-Couch on Style
- On Familiar Style, by Hazlitt
- Samuel Johnson on the Bugbear Style
- Swift on Style
- Synonyms and Variety of Expression, by Walter Alexander Raleigh
- A Vigorous Prose Style, by Henry David Thoreau
From the Latin, "pointed instrument used for writing"
Definitions and Observations:
- "Style is character. It is the quality of a man's emotion made apparent; then by inevitable extension, style is ethics, style is government."
- "If any man wish to write in a clear style, let him be first clear in his thoughts; and if any would write in a noble style, let him first possess a noble soul."
(Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)
- "Style is the dress of thoughts."
- "The style of an author should be the image of his mind, but the choice and command of language is the fruit of exercise."
- "Style is not mere decoration, nor is it an end to itself; it is rather a way of finding and explaining what is true. Its purpose is not to impress but to express."
(Richard Graves, "A Primer for Teaching Style." College Composition and Communication, 1974)
- "A good style should show no sign of effort. What is written should seem a happy accident."
(W. Somerset Maugham, The Summing Up, 1938)
- "Style is that which indicates how the writer takes himself and what he is saying. It is the mind skating circles around itself as it moves forward."
- "Style is the perfection of a point of view."
- "To do a dull thing with style--now THAT'S what I call art."
- "[I]t may well be that style is always to some extent the invention of the writer, a fiction, that conceals the man as surely as it reveals him."
(Carl H. Klaus, "Reflections on Prose Style." Style in English Prose, 1968)
- "Style is knowing who you are, what you want to say and not giving a damn."
- Types of Styles
"A very large number of loosely descriptive terms have been used to characterize kinds of styles, such as 'pure,' 'ornate,' 'florid,' 'gay,' 'sober,' 'simple,' 'elaborate,' and so on. Styles are also classified according to a literary period or tradition ('the metaphysical style, 'Restoration prose style'); according to an influential text ('biblical style, euphuism); according to an institutional use ('a scientific style,' 'journalese'); or according to the distinctive practice of an individual author (the 'Shakespearean' or 'Miltonic' style; 'Johnsonese'). Historians of English prose style, especially in the 17th and 18th centuries, have distinguished between the vogue of the 'Ciceronian style' (named after the characteristic practice of the Roman writer Cicero), which is elaborately constructed, highly periodic, and typically builds to a climax, and the opposing vogue of the clipped, concise, pointed, and uniformly stressed sentences in the 'Attic or 'Senecan' styles (named after the practice of the Roman Seneca). . . .
"Francis-Noel Thomas and Mark Turner, in Clear and Simple as the Truth (1994), claim that standard treatments of style such as those described above deal only with the surface features of writing. They propose instead a basic analysis of style in terms of a set of fundamental decisions or assumptions by an author concerning 'a series of relationships: What can be known? What can be put into words? What is the relationship between thought and language? Who is the writer addressing and why? What is the implied relationship between writer and reader? What are the implied conditions of discourse?' An analysis based on these elements yields an indefinite number of types, or 'families,' of styles, each with its own criteria of excellence."
(M.H. Abrams and Geoffrey Galt Harpham, A Glossary of Literary Terms, 10th ed. Wadsworth, 2012)
- Aristotle and Cicero on the Qualities of Good Style
"Within classical rhetoric, style is analyzed predominately from the viewpoint of the composing orator, not from the point of view of the critic. Quintilian's four qualities (purity, clarity, ornament, and propriety) are not intended to distinguish types of styles but to define the qualities of good style: all oratory should be correct, clear, and appropriately ornamented. The basis for the four qualities and the three styles are implicit in Book III of Aristotle's Rhetoric where Aristotle assumes a dichotomy between prose and poetry. The base line for prose is colloquial speech. Clarity and correctness are the sine qua non of good speech. Furthermore, Aristotle maintains that the very best prose is also urbane or, as he says in the Poetics, has an 'uncommon air,' that gives the listener or reader pleasure."
(Arthur E. Walzer, George Campbell: Rhetoric in the Age of Enlightenment. State Univ. of New York Press, 2003)
- Thomas De Quincey on Style
"Style has two separate functions: first, to brighten the intelligibility of a subject which is obscure to the understanding; secondly, to regenerate the normal power and impressiveness of a subject which has become dormant to the sensibilities. . . . The vice of that appreciation which we English apply to style lies in representing it as a mere ornamental accident of written composition--a trivial embellishment, like the mouldings of furniture, the cornices of ceilings, or the arabesques of tea-urns. On the contrary, it is a product of art the rarest, subtlest, and most intellectual; and, like other products of the fine arts, it is then finest when it is most eminently disinterested--that is, most conspicuously detached from gross palpable uses. Yet, in very many cases, it really has the obvious uses of that gross palpable order; as in the cases just noticed, when it gives light to the understanding, or power to the will, removing obscurities from one set of truths, and into another circulating the life-blood of sensibility."
(Thomas De Quincey, "Language." The Collected Writings of Thomas De Quincy, ed. by David Masson, 1897)