Nobody should be surprised that the most controversial moment in Tuesday's presidential inauguration ceremony was caused by an adverb.
"The road to hell," Stephen King has said, "is paved with adverbs." And now Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. would likely agree.
True, when it comes to the parts of speech, nouns and verbs are the obvious troublemakers. After all, they grab all the headlines and crawl along the bottom of the screen on the cable news channels. But for all that, nouns and verbs can generally be counted on to know exactly where they stand in a sentence.
Not so with adverbs, which can show up almost anywhere. Adverbs are wayward, fickle, vagrant. In some ways, they're throwbacks to a wilder linguistic time when word endings in English (inflections) were more important than word order.
Now as every American schoolchild knows, the Constitution requires a new president to say, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States . . ..”
On Tuesday, in front of a million or so people on the Mall in D.C., Chief Justice Roberts and Mr. Obama solemnly made it past the first adverb without much difficulty. That's often the way it goes. But just when you think you're in full command of the syntax, another adverb sneaks up on you, and--bang!--the verbal parade has suddenly been rerouted. Before you know it, tuba players are tumbling into the Aloha float, majorettes are colliding with Clydesdales, and the Suurimmaanitchuat Eskimo Dance Group has been spirited away to Columbia Heights.
Well, not really--not at all. In most cases, a floating adverb will pass entirely unnoticed. Unless it occurs at a presidential inauguration.
For Roberts, the oath came undone when that second adverb made an impish leap to the end of the clause: " . . . that I will execute the office of President to the United States faithfully . . ..” Yes, I know. He got the preposition wrong as well. But as any second-language learner will tell you, English prepositions are pesky but rarely disruptive. No, it was that slippery adverb that broke the spell.
Roberts then backed up in an effort to rein in the modifier, but that only appeared (or rather, appeared only) to aggravate matters: “Faithfully the office of President of the United States . . ..”
At this point the new president graciously echoed the chief justice’s first error, sliding “faithfully” to the end: "the office of President of the United States faithfully . . .”
Such word play could have gone on longer. By my count, the adverb "faithfully" might have shown up in another two or three spots in that same short clause--each version clear and grammatically correct. Of course only one version appears in Article Two of the United States Constitution. And that's why this evening Chief Justice Roberts was ushered into the Map Room of the White House to re-administer the oath to President Obama.
For a little perspective on the matter, we turn to Mark Twain, writing in The Atlantic Monthly in June 1880: "To misplace an adverb is a thing which I am able to do with frozen indifference; it can never give me a pang. . . . There are subtleties which I cannot master at all--they confuse me, they mean absolutely nothing to me--and this adverb plague is one of them."
More About Adverbs:
- What Is a Sentence Adverb?
- Adding Adjectives and Adverbs to the Basic Sentence Unit
- Sentence Combining With Adjectives and Adverbs
Image: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. re-administering the oath of office to President Barack Obama. Photo courtesy of the White House.


Comments
A most enjoyable diversion today. Ah, but that I could develop an indifference like Twain’s! Far too often I find myself screeching at local and national journalists to revisit “Lolly, Lolly, Lolly get your adverbs here!”
How can I help a student remember when to write “to” or “too”? Are there some helpful mnemonics, sayings, rhymes, etc., that she can use while completing written assignments?
Thanks.
Judy–
You’ll find a few tips at the To and Too page prepared by my colleague Grace Fleming at About.com Homework Tips. All the best.
Richard
Dr. N,
Have you read Steven Pinker’s op-ed on the now notorious adverbial flub? It’s quite fun.
Thanks very much, Rebekah. I’m intrigued (if not fully persuaded) by Dr. Pinker’s interpretation of the chief justice’s flub as a case of “hypercorrection”: “On Tuesday [Roberts's] inner copy editor overrode any instincts toward strict constructionism and unilaterally amended the Constitution by moving the adverb ‘faithfully’ away from the verb.”
By the way, I hope you’ve fully recovered (or recovered fully) from your successful defense!
Stephen King says we should kill all adverbs. I wonder how he feels about using constitutional amendments to accomplish this?
Para 9 – “reign in” Oh, Richard!
Forgive me, but I thought Pinker’s editorial was unkind and uninformed. To suggest that Roberts’s simple instance of misspeaking carries over to writing is absurd. I offer two responses from the National Review Online in which the author actually performed some research before setting fingers to keyboard.
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OGUyNmVjYjJmZDlkMzhlOWQyMDhlMTNhMTFiMjEzZTc=
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjZmMGNjYzhmZGQ4NzA3NWRiYThiMTI2M2Y1N2MwYzI=
Beyond Pinker’s criticism of Roberts, I’ll add that his criticism of a particular legal manual of usage was also unwarranted.
http://blog.legalwriting.net/2009/01/23/the-presidential-oath-splitting-verb-phrases-and-the-texas-law-review-mous.aspx
For what it’s worth, here’s a much more evenhanded and informed discussion of the issue by Benjamin Zimmer on Language Log:
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1039
I assume Twain and King are not bothered by prepositioal phrases used adverbially: “with adverbs” adverbially modifies “is paved”; “with frozen indifference” modifieds “to do”;”absolutely,” “at all,” and “to me” are adverbial.
I like Roy Blount Jr’s observation on this subject. “This adverb advice is so very thoroughly, almost invariably, sound, generally speaking, that to take exception to it, briefly, can’t hurt.” Blount goes on to quote Twain: “A powerful agent is the right word…Whenever we come upon one of these intensely right words in a book or newspaper the resulting effect is physical as well as spiritual, and electrically prompt.”
Down here is South Africa we often hear sports commentators mixing adverbs and adjectives with gay abandon:
“So we get balls that are bowled fast!”
And why did someone rain on your parade?
Whoa! I wish I could attribute my reign for rein blunder to the Cupertino effect, but I’m afraid the mistake was all mine. See Muphry’s Law: the principle that any criticism of the speech or writing of others will itself contain at least one error of usage or spelling.
You can be sure that reign/rein will soon appear (with this mea culpa) in my collection of commonly confused words. Cheers.
Richard