1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Grammar & Composition
photo of Richard Nordquist
Richard's Grammar & Composition Blog

By Richard Nordquist, About.com Guide to Grammar & Composition

Barack Obama's Secret for Stirring a Crowd

Thursday November 6, 2008

Have you ever wondered how Barack Obama does it?

I mean, how he uses words--for the most part simple words--to inspire a crowd the way he did in Chicago's Grant Park on Tuesday night? By the end of Obama's victory speech, Jesse Jackson and Oprah Winfrey weren't the only members of the audience wiping away joyful tears.

Now I'm certainly not dismissing the import of Obama's message or the historical significance of his election. But the powerful effect that Obama's words have on an audience depends largely on the way he uses those words--how he selects and arranges and delivers them. That's what we call rhetoric--and trust me, it's not a dirty word.

In fact, rhetoric is an ancient art and a fairly consequential skill. Thomas Jefferson knew how to use words. So did Abraham Lincoln, John Kennedy, and Martin Luther King, Jr. As it happened, echoes of the words of all four men could be heard in Tuesday night's speech.

Obama's secret--or one part of it, at least--is the magic number three. In rhetorical terms, that's a tricolon: a series of three parallel words, phrases, or clauses. Words such as "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Phrases such as "government of the people, by the people, for the people." Obama's victory speech was teeming with tricolons--as indicated in these excerpts.

If there is anyone out there [1] who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; [2] who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; [3] who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.

[1] It's the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen; by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the very first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different; that their voice could be that difference.

[2] It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled--Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been a collection of Red States and Blue States: we are, and always will be, the United States of America.

[3] It's the answer that led those who have been told for so long by so many to be [1] cynical, [2] and fearful, [3] and doubtful of what we can achieve to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more toward the hope of a better day.

It's been a long time coming, but tonight, because of what we did [1] on this day, [2] in this election, [3] at this defining moment, change has come to America. . . .

I was never the likeliest candidate for this office. We didn't start with much money or many endorsements. Our campaign was not hatched in the halls of Washington--it began [1] in the backyards of Des Moines [2] and the living rooms of Concord [3] and the front porches of Charleston.

It was built by working men and women who dug into what little savings they had to give [1] five dollars [2] and ten dollars [3] and twenty dollars to this cause. It grew strength [1] from the young people who rejected the myth of their generation's apathy; who left their homes and their families for jobs that offered little pay and less sleep; [2] from the not-so-young people who braved the bitter cold and scorching heat to knock on the doors of perfect strangers; [3] from the millions of Americans who [1] volunteered, [2] and organized, [3] and proved that more than two centuries later, a government [1] of the people, [2] by the people [3] and for the people has not perished from this Earth. This is your victory.

I know you didn't do this just to win an election and I know you didn't do it for me. You did it because you understand the enormity of the task that lies ahead. For even as we celebrate tonight, we know the challenges that tomorrow will bring are the greatest of our lifetime--[1] two wars, [2] a planet in peril, [3] the worst financial crisis in a century. Even as we stand here tonight, we know there are brave Americans waking up in the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan to risk their lives for us. There are mothers and fathers who will lie awake after their children fall asleep and wonder how they'll [1] make the mortgage, [2] or pay their doctor's bills, [3] or save enough for college. There is new energy to harness and new jobs to be created; new schools to build and threats to meet and alliances to repair.

The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term, but America--I have never been more hopeful than I am tonight that we will get there. I promise you --we as a people will get there.

There will be setbacks and false starts. There are many who won't agree with every decision or policy I make as President, and we know that government can't solve every problem. But [1] I will always be honest with you about the challenges we face. [2] I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. [3] And above all, I will ask you to join in the work of remaking this nation the only way it's been done in America for 221 years--[1] block by block, [2] brick by brick, [3] calloused hand by calloused hand.

What began twenty-one months ago in the depths of winter must not end on this autumn night. This victory alone is not the change we seek--it is only the chance for us to make that change. And that cannot happen if we go back to the way things were. It cannot happen without you.

So let us summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to [1] pitch in [2] and work harder [3] and look after not only ourselves, but each other. Let us remember that if this financial crisis taught us anything, it's that we cannot have a thriving Wall Street while Main Street suffers--in this country, we rise or fall as one nation, as one people.

Let us resist the temptation to fall back on the same [1] partisanship [2] and pettiness [3] and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long. Let us remember that it was a man from this state who first carried the banner of the Republican Party to the White House--a party founded on the values of [1] self-reliance, [2] individual liberty, [3] and national unity. Those are values we all share, and while the Democratic Party has won a great victory tonight, we do so with a measure of humility and determination to heal the divides that have held back our progress. As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours, "We are not enemies, but friends . . . though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection." And to those Americans whose support I have yet to earn--I may not have won your vote, but [1] I hear your voices, [2] I need your help, and [3] I will be your President too. . . .

[1] This is our chance to answer that call. [2] This is our moment. [3] This is our time--[1] to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids; [2] to restore prosperity and promote the cause of peace; [3] to reclaim the American Dream and reaffirm that fundamental truth--[1] that out of many, we are one; [2] that while we breathe, we hope, and [3] where we are met with [1] cynicism, [2] and doubt, [3] and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of a people: Yes We Can. Thank you, God bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Oh sure, this may look as easy as one, two, three, but the truth is it takes more than a flag-draped stage and a run of tricolons to turn an ordinary speech into great oratory. Also helpful is the occasional series of four--a tetracolon ("democracy, liberty, opportunity, and unyielding hope")--along with effective repetition, a bit of alliteration, and a few conventional metaphors. The insistent use of the first-person plural ("we," "us," and "our") invites identification. And the right combination of anaphora ("It's the answer") and epiphora ("Yes we can") can lift a crowd off its feet and land a speech in the history books.

But that's not all. About 2,000 years ago, Cicero taught us that what makes or breaks a speech is effective delivery, which includes the qualities of dignity and grace:

All these parts of oratory succeed according as they are delivered. Delivery . . . has the sole and supreme power in oratory; without it, a speaker of the highest mental capacity can be held in no esteem; while one of moderate abilities, with this qualification, may surpass even those of the highest talent.
(De Oratore)
So to the list of Obama's persuasive skills add standing tall, speaking forcefully, and exuding confidence.

Oh, and one last thing. Especially in troubled and uncertain times, it never hurts to extend the promise of change, the prospect of hope, and the reminder that we're all in this together.

More About Rhetorical Strategies:

Image: Senator Barack Obama, President-elect of the United States of America

Comments
November 6, 2008 at 3:55 pm
(1) Louis says:

With a sense of compassion(1),with a well preserved innocence(2) and a verb from the heart(3) Obama triggered emotions to tears on more than 80% of the people whom heard him speak on the wee hours of November the 5th 2008; good observation Richard!

November 6, 2008 at 5:34 pm
(2) Franny Syufy says:

Splendid analysis of a speech that will undoubtedly be quoted for many years to come.

I shed tears again, just reading it. Thanks, Richard!

November 7, 2008 at 1:12 am
(3) David Mariant says:

This is an excellent analysis Richard. I will be looking to it later to do a more thorough study of it and hope to apply it to my many addresses I make as a motivational speaker.

His oratory seems to even surpass my dislike for him. While listening to his acceptance speech I too was brought to tears because of the historic moment.

McCain’s speech was also moving particularly when he mentioned the historic moment for Obama.

Thanks again.. David

November 7, 2008 at 11:37 am
(4) Hazel (UK says:

Fascinating analysis – but it leads to the question of whether the best man for the job can lose it because of poor rhetorical selling power – and, in this case – vice versa? When push comes to shove I’m voting for the man/woman not the orator. After all most politicians’ speeches are not written by them anyway so who should the real credit for the oratory go to? Certainly the masses can be swayed by the grand rhetoric – look in recent times at Hitler and Churchill, but for different reasons…a mesmeric ability to charm by outstanding oratory has no intrinsic value (indeed may be artfully manipulated) – for that you need to look at deeds not words. As ever, caveat emptor. Or, as my mother in law was fond of saying “Fine words butter no parsnips”…

November 8, 2008 at 5:33 pm
(5) Mary D says:

Congratulations Richard on your wonderful analysis. It’s almost as good as Obama’s speech!

November 9, 2008 at 2:24 pm
(6) Villy Sogaard says:

Thanks for a most inspiring analysis. I missed only one aspect: The historical weight of the moment. For example, when Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysberg Address, he addressed an audience wounded by the civil war, anxious to hear that its suffering had not been in vein.
Similarly, Obama’s song convincingly eminently placed itself in an historical context, embracing the suffering of the past, the victory of the present, and the dreams of the future in a way that touched even an old and cold Scandinavian heart like mine.
I don’t think any amount of rhetoric per se could seduced us without giving vent to emotions we had before Obama opened his mouth.

Villy

November 10, 2008 at 11:00 am
(7) Maya says:

During my academic journey, I have found a love for the art of rhetoric. It is indeed an art as well as a skill. Thank you for this post, Richard.

November 10, 2008 at 6:46 pm
(8) Isabel says:

Obama is a man with grand visions for his own stature akin to Hitler, Jim Jones, Rev. Wright, and other figures in history who mastered oratory to influence people. Commonly, they are self-serving, narcissist personas that leave destructive legacy. They are so much immersed in their own delusional mindset chasing power, and power alone. The aftermath is so much destruction to the society after their sheepskin cloak exposes a wolf inside. Obama knows that he was still an unripe fruit for US presidency, but his own ego and ambition was so uncontainable, he jumped into the fray audaciously, after he felt comfortable with his rhetorical prowess that he took time to plan and hone during the wayward periods of his life. He is a very smart, cunning, calculating political figure. Our history is replete with such personalities. And the young generations that highly supported him lack the wisdom to sense it, after all, experience is an aging process, like wine, to up its quality. Four years is a long time wait for me and others who had the sanity to refuse Obama.

November 10, 2008 at 7:04 pm
(9) Ann says:

Hazel, has a point. Obama is certainly a great orator, but rhetoric and delivery can be, at times, far removed from real issues and political platforms. Maybe this is necessary to get elected in the States so influenced as we by Hollywood showmanship. We can only hope for the best for all including the poor in the States and those suffering, because of us, in the Middle East.

November 11, 2008 at 5:18 am
(10) grammar says:

You and Hazel are in venerable company, Ann. Plato shared your suspicion of rhetorical showmanship–at least as it was practiced by the Sophists in ancient Greece. Whereas philosophers (the good guys, in his mind) pursue truth, rhetoricians set out only to persuade people to believe.

It was Plato’s sparring partner, Aristotle, who advocated the study of rhetoric–as both a defensive strategy (those who are skilled in rhetoric are best equipped to counter or resist it) and an art (after all, why should the devil have all the good tunes?).

The Roman rhetorician Quintilian preferred to think the best of orators–”since no man can speak well who is not good himself.” But we know better.

My point is that arguments over the ethical nature of rhetoric have been with us for over 2,500 years. But regardless of our stance, there’s no escaping rhetoric. We all use language to persuade others. (Plato himself was a master rhetorician.) Of course some use it more effectively than others–and, indeed, some use it more honorably than others as well.

Thanks very much for your thoughtful comment. And I share your hope for the best.

Richard

November 11, 2008 at 8:42 am
(11) Gwen Nunez Gonzalez says:

Hi Richard,

Hat’s Off to you for your great analysis. My Professor and classmates listen to this powerful speech and agreed that Obama is a transformational leader.

He is a well spoken man and delivers great speeches. I agree that his short phrases and sentences using simple understandable words reached to the big and little people.
I am not an American and could not physically vote but I voted emotionally and in spirit.

I am moved by such a leader who knows how to touch his people and realize that he cannot change America alone. The “we” theme is indeed important for a winning team.

November 12, 2008 at 2:08 pm
(12) PWB says:

You are actually commenting on the grammar and composition of his speech writers. Mr. Obama’s speech was check by his speech writers for grammar. His ad hoc remarks, however, are not. Mr. Obama continually uses “I” in the objective.

The President-Elect answered in his very first press conference “President Bush graciously invited Michelle and I(sic) to meet with him and First Lady Laura Bush. We are gratified by the invitation. I’m sure that in addition to taking a tour of the White House there’s going to be a substantive discussion between myself(sic) and the president…”

During the Presidential Debates, Senator Obama stated “The main disagreement with(sic) John [Edwards] and I(sic) is that John believes…”

For those of who know better, those words were like fingernails scraping on a blackboard. The irritation was so great that I had to rewind my DVR to actually listen to the subsequent words that he spoke after that. Blogs all over the world caught this.

We all know the derision President Bush and Governor Palin received every time that they said “nucular”. I certainly wouldn’t wish this on our new President.

November 17, 2008 at 1:50 am
(13) Raveendra H says:

Indeed a stunning lecture! Every word of his speech floods the reason for ‘hope’. I pray to God that all his words soon translate into actions. And the mankind benefits.
I read sometime back:
“Speeches are like babies -easy to conceive; yet hard to deliver.”
Obama does it brilliently!
Lovely Richard. Thanks for the analysis.

November 17, 2008 at 2:03 pm
(14) Judith Allen says:

Richard,
Thank you for this excellent analysis of Obama’s speeches.
Most of your commenters recognize how hungry America’s populace was for inspiration and straightforward analysis of the terrible state in which our nation finds itself.
Obama’s next challenge is to translate his view of our predicament into action to redress the many grievances we, as a people, have developed over the last 8 years.
This country is in desperate need of restoration.
One post amused me; it was so pathetic.
Comparing Obama’s speeches to those of Jim Jones, Hitler, etc., she ended whining that 4 years is a long time to wait.
(GWB began this trek to disaster bellowing:
“This is a RICH nation!”
He finishes his tenure throwing open the Treasury doors to scrape out every last cent and farthing from the corners, so he can drop the empty Treasury into the lap of the incoming administration, likely thinking ‘Good luck, suckers!’ as he flees Washington with Justice Department lawyers hot on his heels.)
Well, I think most of us are prepared to make sure the current leadership’s journey into the wilderness of the political desert will last 20 to 40 years, at least.
An exile well-earned, richly deserved, considering the long-term damage done to our country’s well-being.
You have a new signed-up member for your e-mails.

January 11, 2009 at 7:28 am
(15) Ajeet Khurana says:

Great post, as always, Richard. Thanks for this interesting analysis. Rhetoric is often seen as negative. But it is empty rhetoric that one should shun. In the case of Obama, we shall soon find out which form of rhetoric he chose.

January 29, 2009 at 9:39 am
(16) Eno says:

Thanks for this interesting analysis.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Discuss
Community Forum
Explore Grammar & Composition
About.com Special Features

Tips that will help finance your education, excel in the classroom, and advance your career. More >

Being well prepared is the first step; here are more essential suggestions. More >

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Grammar & Composition

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.