1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Grammar & Composition
photo of Richard Nordquist

Richard's Grammar & Composition Blog

By Richard Nordquist, About.com Guide to Grammar & Composition

Cost of a Misplaced Comma: $2.13 Million (Canadian)

Thursday October 19, 2006

If you happen to work in the legal division of Rogers Communications Inc., you might be wishing that you had stopped by sooner to check out our Guidelines for Using Commas Effectively. According to Toronto's Globe and Mail, a misplaced comma in a contract to string cable lines along utility poles may cost the Canadian company a whopping $2.13 million.

Back in 2002, when the company signed off on a contract with Aliant Inc., the folks at Rogers were confident that they had locked up a long-term agreement. They were surprised, therefore, when last year Aliant gave notice of a hefty rate-hike--and even more surprised when regulators with the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) backed their claim. It's all right there on page seven of the contract, where it states that the agreement "shall continue in force for a period of five years from the date it is made, and thereafter for successive five year terms, unless and until terminated by one year prior notice in writing by either party.”

The devil is in the details--or, more specifically, in the second comma. “Based on the rules of punctuation,” observed the CRTC regulators, the comma in question “allows for the termination of the [contract] at any time, without cause, upon one-year's written notice.” We'd explain the issue simply by pointing to guideline #4: using a pair of commas to set off interrupting words, phrases, or clauses.

Without that second comma after "successive five year claims," the business about terminating the contract would apply only to successive terms, which is what Rogers' lawyers thought they were agreeing to. However, with the addition of the comma, the phrase "and thereafter for successive five year terms" is treated as an interruption. Certainly that's how Aliant treated it. They didn't wait for that first "period of five years" to expire before giving notice of the rate hike, and thanks to the extra comma, they didn't have to.

“This is a classic case of where the placement of a comma has great importance,” Aliant said. Indeed.

And a final note to the lawyers: both "five year terms" and "one year prior notice" should be hyphenated as "five-year" and "one-year." Picky stuff, this punctuation, but you never know when it's going to make a big difference.

Comments

February 22, 2007 at 3:02 am
(1) frank says:

HANG HIM, NOT LET HIM GO
&
HANG HIM NOT, LET HIM GO

April 30, 2008 at 2:57 pm
(2) jack says:

as sick as this is, it is very brilliant.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Grammar & Composition

About.com Special Features

A Smarter Future

Tips that will help finance your education, excel in the classroom, and advance your career. More >

How to Ace the GRE

Being well prepared is the first step; here are more essential suggestions. More >

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Grammar & Composition

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.